Friday, February 4, 2011

desublimation


Marcuse makes the argument that the progress of technological rationality is causing a process of desublimation of high culture. He argues that as culture becomes more socially integrated it loses its purpose.
“The music of the soul is also the music of salesmanship.”(Marcuse 57)
Marcuse says that the past culture illustrated nature more in its literature. The past culture he is referring to seems to be that of Walt Whitman’s era.
“Artistic alienation is the conscious transcendence of the alienated existence—a ‘higher level’ or medicated alienation. The conflict with the world of progress, the negation of the order of business, the anti-bourgeois elements in bourgeois literature and art neither due to the aesthetic lowliness of this order nor to romantic reaction,”(Marcuse 60)
In Song of Myself 10 Whitman describes being amazed in the woods “at my own lightness and glee.” For Marcuse, Whitman’s expedition into the woods was an example of the artistic alienation. Marcuse argues that as a result of technological integration, an expedition like Whitman’s is impossible.
“The absorbent power of society depletes the artistic dimension by assimilating its antagonistic contents.” (Marcuse 61)
In “Song of Myself” Whitman makes a statement about slavery, Marcuse argues that repressive desublimation results in the dilution of the antagonistic statements in literature and the arts.
The runaway slave came to my house and stopt outside,
I heard his motions crackling the twigs of the woodpile,
Through the swung half-door of the kitchen I saw him limpsy and
weak,
And went where he sat on a log and led him in and assured him,
And brought water and fill'd a tub for his sweated body and bruis'd
feet,”(Whitman 10)
I heard his motions crackling the twigs of the woodpile,
Through the swung half-door of the kitchen I saw him limpsy and
weak,
And went where he sat on a log and led him in and assured him,
And brought water and fill'd a tub for his sweated body and bruis'd
feet,”(Whitman 10)

Whitman shows a runaway slave compassion which is in many ways a critique of the society at the time. Marcuse argues that the type of socially antagonistic writing Whitman exhibits is impossible in the technologically integrated society.
Marcuse argues that the arts should remain “high class” he believes that as the classics become more integrated into society, their antagonistic nature is deprived.
“…but coming to life of the classics as other than themselves; they are deprived of their antagonistic force, of the estrangement which was the very dimension of their truth.”(Marcuse 64)
Marcuse continues to say that culture shouldn’t be as easily accessible, the paperback, while it brings the classics to the masses, diminishes the power of the literature within its pages.
Whitman’s entire work is “sublimation” it creates the images of conditions which are “irreconcilable with the established reality principle,” (Marcuse 72). In “song of myself” Whitman creates long elaborate passages describing the world around him, he creates imagery that is separated from social reality.

It was discussed in class how overtly sexual “song of myself” was. Whitman expresses life through a sexual scope throughout the text and views life as inherently sexual. Marcuse argues that technological progression has de-eroticized the environment. In “song of myself” Whitman describes riding a horse in ostensibly sexual terms:
A gigantic beauty of a stallion, fresh and responsive to my caresses, Head high in the forehead, wide between the ears, Limbs glossy and supple, tail dusting the ground, Eyes full of sparkling wickedness, ears finely cut, flexibly moving.”(Whitman 32)

The technological integration of society, according to Marcuse, has diminished this inherent sexual nature of existence. The operation of a greater deal of sexual freedom has confined sex into “operationalist” terms, in stark contrast to Whitman who sees sexuality as truth.

3 comments:

  1. The good: This is the start of a nimble and sophisticated reading of Whitman using Marcuse. While I'm not completely convinced that Marcuse would be a big fan of Whitman (question: is Whitman's vision of democracy true freedom or false freedom, from Marcuse's viewpoint?), I think you are doing a good job of pointing out moments in Whitman's text which could be used to illustrate Marcuse's argument & worldview. You are sketching out a potent argument.

    The bad: What do you think, at the end of the day? It's an able attempt to show how we can read Whitman using Marcuse - but is that what you want to do? Do you find that you *gain* something from reading Whitman through Marcse? If so, what is it? If your skeptical, why, and what does that skepticism mean? To put it another way: you've given some good, "small picture" moments of how we can read Whitman using Marcuse. But what's the "big picture"? What do you want to do?

    The ugly: Just so you know, you can fix your formatting after the fact - when viewing the post, just click on the little pencil underneath it, beside "Posted by jeff ihaza." I didn't fix everything, but I fixed enough to show you that it's really not that hard. Anyway, it's no big deal - I just wanted to show you that you could fix things after the fact.

    ReplyDelete
  2. I liked your comparison of Marcuse and Whitman and understood your reasoning for comparing what you did. I just think you should have added more oppinion as to how you feel about the situation and if you agree with either Marcuse or Whitman.

    ReplyDelete