“Well,
never mind. I am a New Englander, like
Emerson. You must learn about him, for
he was important to your people. He had
a hand in your destiny. Yes, perhaps
that is what I mean. I had a feeling
that your people were somehow connected with my destiny. That what happened to you was connected with
what would happen to me…” (Ellison, 41)
The
concept of fate is heavily embedded in many works of literature, plays, movies,
in addition to playing a major role in religion. It is a concept that has been toyed with,
debated, and manipulated as long as there has been human life. Does fate happen to us? Are our paths predestined? Or is our fate self-manufactured, a product
of our daily decisions? Perhaps, in some
ways, fate is a convenient excuse.
Through their respective works, authors Melville and Ellison use their
works to describe fate and what they believe to be its connotations. In Herman Melville’s Moby Dick, fate, or perhaps, Captain Ahab’s obsessive devotion to
carrying out what he believes to be his fate, in the end brings himself and his
crew to their untimely demise. Throughout
the novel, Ahab’s devotion to carrying out this destiny worries his entire
crew, who know too well that they too will be caught up in his maddening desire
to confront the white whale. Even when
questioned, Ahab remains loyal to what he believes to be his fate, ignoring
logic and the obvious signs of his own impending doom. While Captain Ahab believes his fate lies in
the destruction of the white whale, Mr. Norton, a character from Ellison’s Invisible Man; a founding member of the
narrator’s college, believes that his fate lies in the further expansion of the
college he has helped found and the creation of more bright young African
American scholars. However, both of
these characters are questioned on their fate and its merits. And yet, despite this questioning, neither
waver from their paths; a sign that perhaps Mr. Norton, much like Captain Ahab,
will be, in one way or another, destroyed by his devotion to his fate.
It
is hard to understand what Melville’s stance on fate is, among other things;
his views on fate seem ambivalent. On
one hand, the reader comes to understand that captain Ahab feels truly compelled
by fate, so much so that he has chosen to abandon all life on land, including a
wife and child. “Aye, I widowed that
poor girl when I married her, Starbuck; and then the madness, the frenzy, the
boiling blood and the smoking brow, with which for a thousand lowers old Ahab
has furiously foamingly, chased his prey…”
(Melville 591) It is hard to
imagine someone abandoning their entire life on land for the pursuit of a whale
if they weren’t utterly compelled by some sort of malevolent outside force. However, Starbuck makes a simple argument in
return, why not simply turn back around and go home to our wives and
families? After all, Starbuck argues, it
is extremely simple. “Away! Let us away!—this instant let me alter the
course!” In the end, is Ahab not captain
of the ship, and therefore able to alter his destiny by giving up this wild
chase and returning home after forty long years at sea? Ahab seemingly has a choice, and has the
power to change his own fate. However, despite
feeling clear sorrow and regret about the way Ahab has lived his life, he continues
on. His rational is unwavering; he has
no choice but to continue on, despite how much he wishes that he could turn
back, believing yet again that his destiny lies within the hands of a higher
power. “What is it, what nameless, inscrutable, unearthly thing is it; what
cozening, hidden lord and master, and cruel, remorseless emperor commands
me.” (Melville 592) It is as if Ahab’s faith in destiny, and
belief and adherence to the path which has been determined for him by some
higher power, rather than destiny itself, is what compels him forward rather
than destiny itself. From the very
beginning of the novel, Ahab makes it is his purpose and destiny to kill Moby
Dick—a destiny that goes unfulfilled, as Ahab and the rest of the crew are
killed by the white whale. If not for
Ahab’s obsessive pursuit and his belief that God himself was compelling him to
do it, then the whole crew may have survived.
It appears that Melville may be suggesting that it was Ahab’s blinding
devotion to fate that damned the Pequod, and in the end, that ruined his life.
In
Ellison’s Invisible Man we are
presented with a seemingly much more benevolent character, Mr. Norton. Mr. Norton is one of the original founders of
the University in which the nameless narrator of the novel attends. However, similar to Ahab, Mr. Norton
steadfastly believes in the idea that his fate is closely intertwined with
those of the students of the University.
So much so that he claims that his entire fate lies within each and
every one of his students, how they are his legacy and his triumph, including
the narrator. “…you are involved in my
life quite intimately, even though you’ve never seen me before. You are bound to a great dream and to a
beautiful monument…whatever you become, and even if you fail, you are my
fate.” (Ellison, 43-44) Much like Ahab’s fate is fixed on the
destruction of Moby Dick, so is Mr. Norton’s fate tied to the fate of his
school and its students. However, it appears
that Mr. Norton’s belief and fate, and what it drives him to do, are seemingly
much more benevolent than Captain Ahab’s intentions. Despite this, there is another character, a
vet who treats Mr. Norton after his series of fainting spells, who questions
Mr. Norton’s intentions much like Starbuck questioned Ahab’s. Upon Norton telling the vet that he believes
that the school is part of his destiny, he replies, “You cannot see or hear or
smell the truth of what you see—and you, looking for destiny! It’s classic!...To you he is a mark on the
scorecard of your achievement, a thing and not a man; a child, or even less—a black
amorphous thing.” (Ellison, 95) The vet
tears down Mr. Norton’s beliefs and notion of fate and destiny lying with the
school. Instead, the vet claims that the
narrator, and others like him who attend the school aren’t his destiny, but
rather like a type of trophy he wishes to win in order to make his supposed “destiny”
seem valid. However, by doing so, he
neglects to see the students, the school, and the narrator as what they are—and
instead assigns them another meaning by calling them his fate. By doing so, he sets himself up for the possibilities
of great glory and terrible disappointment.
The parallels between the two are
seemingly clear enough as to justify that Ellison was perhaps influenced by
Melville on the notion of fate. Both
characters assign higher meaning to worldly things and call them fate. Captain Ahab’s fate lies within the
destruction of the great whale, whereas Mr. Norton’s fate resides within the
school he founded and the students—however, by doing this, by assigning a type
of higher meaning to a white whale and a school both characters commit a fatal
flaw. By calling something their fate
and simply following through with what their “fate” chooses to do, they neglect
are blinded. Ahab fails to see that he
has choice, and an entire crew to care for, and Mr. Norton seemingly neglects
the fact that the students are all individuals and the campus is more than
eager, well cared for students. They
neglect to see their options, their choices, or see people as people or things
as simply what they are. Despite questioning,
both go on believing, no matter how ill-advised it may seem. Although we do not yet know the fate of Mr.
Norton, if we are to believed that Ellison was influenced by Melville, we can
surmise that like Ahab, Mr. Norton’s blind devotion to fate will bring him
pain, and perhaps ruin in one form or another.
Regardless of their differing intentions, both characters possess the
same fatal flaw, and will face the same consquences.
Note: the two characters associated with fate in the two different novels are aging, powerful white men. I'd suggest that this isn't an accident, for either Melville or Ellison.
ReplyDeleteThe thing absent from your discussion of Ahab's fatalism, for me, is the spiritual/intellectual dimension to it. To face the whale is to deal with the harsh reality of the world (the pasteboard mask; the candles) whereas to turn away from him is to pretend the world is something which it isn't. In other words, one (very friendly to Ahab) viewpoint would claim that he only has one choice *if* he doesn't abandon what he has come to believe about the structure of the world and the nature of divinity.
I brought that up at length because Invisible Man doesn't take true fate - e.g., in Presbyterian terms - seriously, but Moby-Dick at least plays with it, which would be one way of exploring the topics that interest you.
The process of (falsely) assigning higher meaning to worldly things is extremely important here. To make this argument in more depth, I'd like to see you think about whether there is a similar voice to the Vet's in Moby-Dick. Starbuck, of course, is a good candidate for that voice, but he's not the only one.
To bring some things together: both books are interested in monumental egos, and offer some responses/critiques to those monumental egos. But you're much clearer on what the nature of the critique is in Ellison than in Melville.
Note: the opening quote could take us to Ralph Waldo Emerson's views on this subject, which would be interesting.