“The most
effective and enduring form of warfare against liberation is the implanting of material
and intellectual needs that perpetuate obsolete forms of the struggle for existence. The intensity, the satisfaction and even the
character of human needs, beyond the biological level, have always been
preconditioned.” (Marcuse 4)
Again and again in the Invisible
Man we witness the effect of possessions and “necessities” on the Narrator
and his view on the material goods blacks wish to gain. His experiences and his
thoughts both agree with Marcuse that material and even intellectual goods only
suppress him and other blacks in the end.
The narrator’s thoughts on this
subject are perhaps most clear on page 256 where he tells us those” who sought
to achieve the status of brokers through imagination alone, a group of janitors
and messengers who spent most of their wages on clothing such as was
fashionable among Wall Street brokers, with their Brooks Brothers suits and
bowler hats, English umbrellas, black calfskin shoes and yellow gloves; with
their orthodox and passionate argument as to what was the correct tie to wear
with what shirt, what shade of gray was correct for spats”. These clothes do not free these “janitors” from
their position as poor blacks in New York and instead causes them to work to
make money for things they do not need.
They become entrapped in the system that Marcuse describes where we work
because we are preconditioned to desire things we do not need and thus must
work more. However, they are not even working for a future generation but to show
they are not the stereotype others believe of them.
However, just as quickly as our
narrator espouses these thoughts he seems to go back on them. The first thing
he does with his new-found wealth from the brotherhood is buy himself a very
nice suit. “I selected a more expensive suit than I’d intended, and while it
was being altered I picked up a hat, shirts, shoes, underwear and socks, then
hurried to call Brother Jack, who snapped his orders like a general.” (Ellison
331) I think it is this last part of
this sentence that we need to look at if we wish to understand this sudden
change in our narrator. Our narrator, who had previously separated himself from
the “dreamers” and redefined himself as a black-man who was not afraid to be
black, shown by him eating yams, has now been offered a new position and gives
up part of his individuality and identify to be accepted by the brotherhood. He hurries to his new master’s call and obeys
his “orders” giving up his name, his family, and speaking for them instead of
just himself. Although he is fighting
for the people he has subjected himself to the “material needs” that society
dictates so that society will accept him instead of accepting himself. This passage also shows that he is not
entering a good community if the people he is with value such “material needs”
and later “intellectual needs” instead of the biological and individual. The Brotherhood is then not so anti-establishment as it first appears.
The most obvious show of our
narrator’s disassociation with material goods and lifestyle is in the prologue,
where he tells us of his current life.
In this section he has surpassed his state before and has entered into a
new way of life, he tells us “(before I discovered the advantages of being
invisible) I went through the routine process of buying service and paying
their outrageous rates. But no more. I
gave up all that, along with my apartment, and old way of life.” Our narrator,
abandoned the material needs we find the most basic such as an official home
and address to pursue a life we have not been preconditioned for but that is
perhaps more natural. At least in the world today you must have a home address,
every application, government form, and document whether it makes sense or not requires
one for completion. By rejecting a
standard home and with it a standard life of forms and paid for electricity our
narrator not only becomes invisible to the government and society but rejects
these common conveniences as unnecessary.
Why should he or we have a standard home when we can find a space to
live in warmth, why should we pay for electricity or what we assume must be gas
and water when we can get it anyways, why live in a world of forms? On the one hand this lifestyle can suggest law-breaking
and anarchy, on another it could suggest Communism where these services will be
free, he seems to use it more to suggest individuality, a person not controlled
by preconditioning, not pursuing obsolete forms of the struggle for existence.
Throughout Invisible Man Ellison
repeatedly shows us that material and even intellectual needs that are not
biological are not necessary. He shows
they are trappings of a society that bring men down and waste their money instead of imparting the happiness or fulfillment that they expect. Janitor do not become brokers by their clothes,
nice clothes and a nice apartment only trap the narrator with the Brotherhood,
and it is only in the isolation and anonymity of an unknown basement that our
narrator is free to hibernate and explore himself and truth.
I found this essay very intriguing and I think your argument has a solid foundation. The relationship between Marcuse and Ellison is clearly explained and substantiated. The examples you chose from Ellison are great for your argument. However, I would have liked to have heard a little more from Marcuse on the matter. Engaging Marcuse a little more in key moments of your argument would nicely aid an already solid argument. You also mention how this argument relates to our modern society but you did not go into much detail or explanation. Expanding on this idea a bit may help your argument in relating to the reader on a direct level.
ReplyDeleteOverall, you have a great argument and a well written essay. This essay would be even better with more examples and deeper explanations. Good luck!
Like Jesse, I think this is great. Also like Jesse, I think there are benefits to be had from engaging with Marcuse at greater length, in greater detail.
ReplyDeleteMostly, though, I just think this is a reading which could be productively expanded. See, for instance, the role that Cadillacs play in the novel (pg 101, 137, 493 - but especially 101). Also see Marcuse on Cadillacs. Just as much as clothing, the prospect of having cadillacs, like Bledsoe, summarizes the structure of desire (and its artificiality here).
That's just the start, of course. Everywhere desire is channelled and manipulated - both Ellison and Marcuse are very good on this subject. And so are you!