From the reading Ishmael presents a representation of the
people of the United States as a wild, untamed, and enticing place to a degree
but p that pales in comparison of the unknown wonder of the people of the rest
of the Americas and Africa.
With
regards to the United States and the English, perspectives into the difference
in fundamental character can be seen when Ishmael describes a hypothetical
interaction between a passing Yankee and Englishman at sea. This interaction, though specific to whaling,
is relevant to understanding Melville’s perspective on the United States as
everything, really in Moby Dick is unified through the lens of whaling,
including this perspective on countries.
He begins by saying “your Englishman is rather reserved, and your Yankee
he does not fancy that sort of thing in anybody but himself” (286). This description draws a great contrast
between a less talkative assumingly more polite and possibly refined Englishman
with an unbridled and self-concerned American. He continues in this description by
expressing the fact that the English whaleman tend to look down on the Yankee
fisherman viewing them as unrefined.
The fact that the Englishman looks down on the Yankees seems to come
from more of an inherent fundamental sense as notes Ishmael “the Yankees in one
day, collectively, kill more whales than all the English, collectively, in ten
years”(286). These quotations together
hint at an opinion of the English which is more conservative and cultured
contrasted with the Yankee who is unabashed and adventurous. And importantly, Ishmael stresses the fact
that in the end, the American is the much better and more efficient fisherman. In terms of whaling in the end it’s the
number of fish that matters most in terms of money and in terms of respect so
here a sense of admiration can possibly inferred. And indeed especially with
the descriptions of Ahab, an example of a Yankee fisherman, Melville through
Ishmael paints a heroic picture of a gritty tormented adventurer facing certain
death.
At the
same time that there is a contrast presented between the Englishman and the
Yankee, an even greater contrast is presented between the sailors from the
United States and those from the Americas and Africa. An example of a description of a shipmate
from Nantucket, Flask, is described as a “short, stout ruddy young fellow, […]
ignorant, unconscious [ly] fearless [which] made him a little waggish in the
matter of whales” (153). Daggoo, in
contrast, a harpooner is described as “a gigantic, coal-black negro-savage,
[with a] corporeal humility in looking up at him; and a white man standing
before him seemed a white flag come to beg truce of a fortress” (155). Paralleling these two descriptions, a picture
is painted of a naïve and earnest white man versus a quietly strong regal African
man. It can be inferred that the narrator
has the deeper respect for Daggoo which can also be seen in a scene when Daggoo
holds Flask up on his shoulders to see with better ease in the pursuit of a
group of whales. Ishmael says “ the sight of little Flask mounted upon gigantic
Daggoo was yet more curious; for sustaining himself with a cool, indifferent,
easy, unthought of, barbaric majesty, the noble negro to every roll of the sea
harmoniously rolled his fine form. On
his broad back, flaxen-haired Flask seemed like a snow-flake. The bearer looked nobler than the rider” (267)
In this description, though Flask is in charge and actually the one looking in
the distance to the whales, he is literally useless without Daggoo’s form and
obedience. It is explicitly stated that
Daggoo is more noble, useful, and invaluable to the voyage. To further the comparison between the members
of the Pequod in general, the harpooners, the ones who do the actual job of
killing the fish are all of an ethnic origin while those in the higher ranks on
the ship are all white Americans. And
here a connection is drawn from the whaling industry to the rest of the
industry in the United States as stated “it is the same with the American whale
fishery as with the American army, military and the merchant naives, and the
engineering forces employed in the construction of the American Canals and
Railroads. The same, I say, because in
all these cases the native American liberally provides the brains, the rest of
the world as generously supplying the muscles”(155). This revealing quotations shows a perspective
in which the Americans are the ones who are in charge or guiding the work,
while the rest of the world or those from the Americas and Africa provide the
more physically demanding support.
To
bring the two comparisons together, it can be suggested that America according
to Ishmael may be a sort of bridge between the modernized Europe of the day and
the newly colonized lands. Americans,
descendents of Europeans, are presented as a having a sense of order to a degree
but still a bit of wild and untamed desire for adventure. Perhaps the opinion is that the American are
better able to relate to the other cultures being from a colony themselves and
able to get the others to cooperate and ultimately work within their will to
progress their own economy.
I think you understate what you're doing here, or maybe you don't realize the full potential of what you're doing.
ReplyDeletePoint 1: Melville gives us a lot of nationalist language about the U.S., its power, its achievements re: whaling, etc.
Point 2: Melville undercuts "the West" broadly speaking in comparison with "primitive" or "aboriginal people." Your comparison of Dagoo and Flash is a great starting point, but is only the tip of the iceberg.
Question: What does it mean that Melville is seemingly (on the surface) a fervent nationalist, but also a fervent critic of "white, civilized man"?
Your final paragraph gives a muted answer to that implicit question. I actually like the answer, in part because it recognizes the value or worth Melville sees in America. But it quiets down a raging critique perhaps too much - you downplay the seriousness of Melville elevating Dagoo while bringing Flash down.